Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 16.070
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 325, 2024 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts allow children with hydrocephalus to survive and avoid brain injury (J Neurosurg 107:345-57, 2007; Childs Nerv Syst 12:192-9, 1996). The Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network implemented non-randomized quality improvement protocols that were shown to decrease infection rates compared to pre-operative prophylactic intravenous antibiotics alone (standard care): initially with intrathecal (IT) antibiotics between 2007-2009 (J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:22-9, 2011), followed by antibiotic impregnated catheters (AIC) in 2012-2013 (J Neurosurg Pediatr 17:391-6, 2016). No large scale studies have compared infection prevention between the techniques in children. Our objectives were to compare the risk of infection following the use of IT antibiotics, AIC, and standard care during low-risk CSF shunt surgery (i.e., initial CSF shunt placement and revisions) in children. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study at 6 tertiary care children's hospitals was conducted using Pediatric Health Information System + (PHIS +) data augmented with manual chart review. The study population included children ≤ 18 years who underwent initial shunt placement between 01/2007 and 12/2012. Infection and subsequent CSF shunt surgery data were collected through 12/2015. Propensity score adjustment for regression analysis was developed based on site, procedure type, and year; surgeon was treated as a random effect. RESULTS: A total of 1723 children underwent initial shunt placement between 2007-2012, with 1371 subsequent shunt revisions and 138 shunt infections. Propensity adjusted regression demonstrated no statistically significant difference in odds of shunt infection between IT antibiotics (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.82-1.81, p = 0.3) and AICs (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56-1.49, p = 0.7) compared to standard care. CONCLUSION: In a large, observational multicenter cohort, IT antibiotics and AICs do not confer a statistically significant risk reduction compared to standard care for pediatric patients undergoing low-risk (i.e., initial or revision) shunt surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Humanos , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Masculino , Preescolar , Femenino , Lactante , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Adolescente , Inyecciones Espinales , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres
2.
Br J Surg ; 111(2)2024 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747515

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine is being adopted for postoperative surveillance but requires evaluation for efficacy. This study tested a telephone Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) to diagnose surgical site infection (SSI) after abdominal surgery in low- and middle-income countries. METHOD: A multi-centre, international, prospective study was embedded in the FALCON trial; a factorial RCT testing measures to reduce SSI in seven low- and middle-income countries (NCT03700749). It was conducted according to a pre-registered protocol (SWAT126) and reported according to STARD guidelines. The reference test was in-person review by a trained clinician at 30 postoperative days according to US Centres for Disease Control criteria. The index test was telephone administration of an adapted WHQ at 27 to 30 postoperative days by a researcher blinded to the outcome of in-person review. The sum of item response scores generated an overall score between 0 and 29. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the WHQ, defined as the proportion of SSI correctly identified by the telephone WHQ, and summarized using the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and diagnostic test accuracy statistics. RESULTS: Patients were included from three upper-middle income (396 patients, 13 hospitals), three lower-middle income (746 patients, 19 hospitals), and one low-income country (54 patients, 4 hospitals). 90.3% (1088 of 1196) patients were successfully contacted. Those with non-midline incisions (adjusted odds ratio: 0.36, 95% c.i. 0.17 to 0.73, P=0.005) or a confirmed diagnosis of SSI on in-person assessment (odds ratio: 0.42, 95% c.i. 0.20 to 0.92, P=0.006) were harder to reach. The questionnaire correctly discriminated between most patients with and without SSI (AUROC 0.869, 95% c.i. 0.824 to 0.914), which was consistent across subgroups. A representative cut-off score of ≥4 displayed a sensitivity of 0.701 (0.610-0.792), specificity of 0.911 (0.878-0.943), positive predictive value of 0.723 (0.633-0.814) and negative predictive value of 0.901 (0.867-0.935). CONCLUSION: SSI can be diagnosed using a telephone questionnaire (obviating in-person assessment) in low resource settings.


A wound infection happens when germs enter the cut made in your body by a doctor when you are operated on. Germs are small organisms that cannot be seen by your eyes, but they can cause problems in the healing of the cut. Infection is the most common problem after surgery and can delay you getting out of hospital and back to normal life. The current way to check whether you have an infection is for a doctor or nurse to look at the cut made on your tummy and see how it is healing. For example, a doctor may check if the cut has a green liquid oozing from it or if the area of the wound is red or swollen. A month after you leave hospital, a doctor may ask you to come back for a follow-up visit. However, this will require you to travel to hospital and take a day off work or away from your family, and can be expensive and time-consuming if you travel far. We wanted to find out if talking to a doctor over the phone would work as well as you travelling to hospital to show the wound to a doctor or nurse in person. To do this, we asked over 1000 patients who had recently undergone surgery to be checked using both methods­to take a phone call from one doctor and be checked in person by a different doctor. We were able to compare the phone follow-up and in-person check to see if the doctors came to a different conclusion. We also looked at whether patients were able to receive a phone call at home and their experience of the process. For most patients, the phone call from a doctor was just as good at seeing if a patient had an infection as a face-to-face check-up by a doctor. However, the phone call was not perfect all the time, particularly for patients with very mild infections. Most patients were able to receive the phone call after a few tries and all patients were very happy with the process. As an international research team, we are now trying new ways to improve the phone call, including looking at the wound over video if possible. A phone call to check how your wound is healing can now be used as a substitute for a face-to-face check-up by a doctor. If you have any worries about your wound after the phone call you should still seek help from a doctor or nurse. We hope that the phone call will be more convenient for patients like you to avoid travelling back to hospital and taking time away from your work and family.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Abdomen/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Telemedicina , Teléfono
3.
Int J Nanomedicine ; 19: 3991-4005, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720939

RESUMEN

Purpose: Surgical site infections pose a significant challenge for medical services. Systemic antibiotics may be insufficient in preventing bacterial biofilm development. With the local administration of antibiotics, it is easier to minimize possible complications, achieve drugs' higher concentration at the injured site, as well as provide their more sustained release. Therefore, the main objective of the proposed herein studies was the fabrication and characterization of innovative hydrogel-based composites for local vancomycin (VAN) therapy. Methods: Presented systems are composed of ionically gelled chitosan particles loaded with vancomycin, embedded into biomimetic collagen/chitosan/hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels crosslinked with genipin and freeze-dried to serve in a flake/disc-like form. VAN-loaded carriers were characterized for their size, stability, and encapsulation efficiency (EE) using dynamic light scattering technique, zeta potential measurements, and UV-Vis spectroscopy, respectively. The synthesized composites were tested in terms of their physicochemical and biological features. Results: Spherical structures with sizes of about 200 nm and encapsulation efficiencies reaching values of approximately 60% were obtained. It was found that the resulting particles exhibit stability over time. The antibacterial activity of the developed materials against Staphylococcus aureus was established. Moreover, in vitro cell culture study revealed that the surfaces of all prepared systems are biocompatible as they supported the proliferation and adhesion of the model MG-63 cells. In addition, we have demonstrated significantly prolonged VAN release while minimizing the initial burst effect for the composites compared to bare nanoparticles and verified their desired physicochemical features during swellability, and degradation experiments. Conclusion: It is expected that the developed herein system will enable direct delivery of the antibiotic at an exposed to infections surgical site, providing drugs sustained release and thus will reduce the risk of systemic toxicity. This strategy would both inhibit biofilm formation and accelerate the healing process.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quitosano , Hidrogeles , Staphylococcus aureus , Vancomicina , Vancomicina/química , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Hidrogeles/química , Hidrogeles/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Quitosano/química , Ácido Hialurónico/química , Ácido Hialurónico/farmacología , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Colágeno/química , Colágeno/farmacología , Tamaño de la Partícula , Liberación de Fármacos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos
5.
Br J Community Nurs ; 29(5): 248-250, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701010

RESUMEN

Many surgical site infections (SSI) emerge after the patient is discharged from hospital. So, practice and district nurses should remain alert for SSIs and address modifiable risk factors, which include helping obese patients lose weight, optimising glucose control in people with diabetes and encouraging smoking cessation. Animals, including pets, are important reservoirs of resistant bacteria. By optimising SSI care, nurses can not only improve wound healing but also help preserve antibiotic efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Mascotas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Animales , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria , Perros , Gatos
7.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1159-1166, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer management, necessitates a nuanced understanding of complications that may impede treatment progression. This study scrutinize the impact of Haemoblock hemostatic solution, evaluation it's potential in reducing seroma complication by controlling lymph flow and obliterating axillary dead space. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial was conducted with 58 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and ALND, stratified into two groups: Group A (ALND + Haemoblock, n = 29) and Group B (ALND + placebo, n = 29). Postoperative drainage charts were monitored, with the primary endpoint being the time to drain removal, Additionally, patients were observed for surgical site infection (SSI). RESULTS: Group A exhibited a marginally higher mean total drain output (398 +/- 205 vs. 326 +/- 198) compared to Group B, this difference did not attain statistical significance (p = 0.176). Equally, the mean time to drain removal demonstrated no discernible distinction between the two groups (6 +/- 3.0 vs. 6 +/- 3.0, Group A vs. Group B, p = 0.526). During follow up, nine patients in Group A required seroma aspiration (mean aspiration 31 +/- 73) as compared to Group B, 6 patients required aspiration (mean aspiration 12 +/- 36), p = 0.222). No notable disparity in SSI rates between the groups was identified. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the administration of Haemoblock did not manifest a discernible effect in mitigating seroma production, hastening drain removal, or influencing SSI rates following ALND. The study underscores the intricate and multifactorial nature of seroma formation, suggesting avenues for future research to explore combined interventions and protracted follow-up periods for a more comprehensive understanding.


Asunto(s)
Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama , Hemostáticos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Seroma , Humanos , Seroma/prevención & control , Seroma/etiología , Femenino , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Doble Ciego , Mastectomía Segmentaria/efectos adversos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Drenaje , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
9.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 69, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681100

RESUMEN

Introduction: the risk management system is useful to identify, analyze, and reduce the risk occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in health services. This system suggests useful improvements to patients and to the whole institution and also contributes to the acquisition of a collective and organizational safety culture. This study presented a state of the art of the management of AEs identified in different services of a regional hospital in the north of Morocco. Methods: this is a retrospective cross-sectional exploratory study carried out from 2017 to 2019 using observations and semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, re-transcribed, and analyzed. Data was also collected from audit reports, results of investigations of the nosocomial infection control committee and the risk management commission, AEs declaration sheets, and meetings reports. Results: a number of 83 AEs were recorded, 10 of which were urgent. The reported events were related to care, infection risk, the drugs circuit, and medico-technical events. Two hundred cases of nosocomial infections were also recorded, of which 75 occurred in the intensive care unit and 35 in the maternity service. Surgical site infections were the most frequently reported complication. Adverse events were related to organizational failure, equipment problems, and errors related to professional practices. Conclusion: our findings may guide the improvement of the event management system in order to reduce the occurrence of future incidents. Thus, improving the risk management system requires setting up training strategies for staff on the importance of this system and its mode of operation.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Errores Médicos , Gestión de Riesgos , Humanos , Marruecos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gestión de Riesgos/organización & administración , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales , Femenino , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Masculino
10.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14884, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654483

RESUMEN

Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), a routine nursing procedure before paediatric bowel surgery, is widely should in clinical practice, but its necessity remains controversial. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the effect of preoperative MBP in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound-related complications in order to analyse the clinical application value of MBP in paediatric bowel surgery. As of November 2023, we searched four online databases: the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Two investigators screened the collected studies against inclusion and exclusion criteria, and ROBINS-I was used to evaluate the quality of studies. Using RevMan5.3, a meta-analysis of the collected data was performed, and a fixed-effect model or a random-effect model was used to analyse OR, 95% CI, SMD, and MD. A total of 11 studies with 2556 patients were included. Most of studies had moderate-to-severe quality bias. The results of meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications related to postoperative infections in children with MBP before bowel surgery versus those with No MBP, wound infection (OR 1.11, 95% CI:0.76 ~ 1.61, p = 0.59, I2 = 5%), intra-abdominal infection (OR 1.26, 95% CI:0.58 ~ 2.77, p = 0.56, I2 = 9%). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative bowel anastomotic leak (OR 1.07, 95% CI:0.68 ~ 1.68, p = 0.78, I2 = 12%), and anastomotic dehiscence (OR 1.67, 95% CI:0.13 ~ 22.20, p = 0.70, I2 = 73%). Patients' intestinal obstruction did not show an advantage of undergoing MBP preoperatively, with an incidence of intestinal obstruction (OR 1.95, 95% CI:0.55 ~ 6.93, p = 0.30, I2 = 0%). Based on existing evidence that preoperative MBP in paediatric bowel surgery did not reduce the risk of postoperative wound complications, we cautiously assume that MBP before surgery is unnecessary for children undergoing elective bowel surgery. However, due to the limited number of study participants selected for this study and the overall low quality of evidence, the results need to be interpreted with caution. It is suggested that more high quality, large-sample, multicenter clinical trials are required to validate our findings.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Niño , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Preescolar , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Catárticos/uso terapéutico
11.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 141, 2024 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676785

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Protective stoma after rectal surgery has been associated with important complications. The most common is surgical site infection (SSI) high rates after stoma reversal reported in literature. Our study compared the rate of SSI of two skin closure techniques, linear closure, and purse string closure. METHODS: We carried out a single center, prospective, randomized controlled trial in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico of Rome between January 2018 through December 2021, to compare LC vs PS closure of ileostomy sites. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients (53.84% male) with a mean age of 65.68 ± 14.33 years were finally evaluated in the study. 58 patients were included in the PS group and 59 patients in the LC one. There was a marked difference in the SSI rate between the two arms of the study: 3 of 58 patients in the purse-string arm versus 11 of 59 in the control arm (p = 0.043). The outcome of cosmesis was also higher in PS, with a statistical significance (mean ± DS 4,01 ± 0,73 for PS group vs mean ± DS 2,38 ± 0,72 for LC group, p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the PS technique had a significantly lower incidence of stoma site SSI compared with LC technique. Our findings are in line with other randomized studies and suggest that PS closure could be considered as standard of care for wound closure after ileostomy reversal.


Asunto(s)
Ileostomía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Técnicas de Sutura , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas
12.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 90(1): 67-71, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669652

RESUMEN

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of infection after perioperative intra-articular steroid injection during elbow arthroscopy. Starting from May 2019, we prospectively included all patients that underwent an elbow arthroscopy for various indications. All patients received preoperative antibiotics intravenously and a corticosteroid injection immediately after portal closure. Patients who needed ligamentous repair and aged below 18 years old were excluded. Final follow up of all patients was 3 months. In total, 108 elbow arthroscopies were performed in 100 patients. No major complications and 1 minor complication were seen. One patient developed a seroma that resolved spontaneously after 14 days without intervention or antibiotics. In this patient group, a perioperative corticosteroid injection following elbow arthroscopy did not increase the chance of infection.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Articulación del Codo , Humanos , Artroscopía/métodos , Artroscopía/efectos adversos , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Masculino , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adolescente , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación
15.
AORN J ; 119(5): 321-331, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661454

RESUMEN

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to negative outcomes for patients and health care organizations. Compliance with clinical practice guidelines likely can help prevent SSIs. An interdisciplinary team at a regional referral center in Michigan sought to reduce SSIs by improving compliance with the facility's preoperative antibiotic selection, dosing, timing, and redosing protocol. The interventions for the quality improvement project included adding the preprocedural antibiotics and doses to the master OR schedule; holding an education session for all preoperative nurses, intraoperative nurses, and anesthesia professionals; and posting a reference guide in the preoperative and intraoperative areas. Compliance with the facility's protocol for antibiotic selection, dosing, and timing significantly improved. However, SSI rates and compliance with redosing recommendations did not change significantly. The team decided to add the antibiotic order information to the master OR schedule permanently. The team plans to consider providing education sessions on administering preprocedural antibiotics outside the OR.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Adhesión a Directriz , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/normas , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Michigan , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
16.
Br J Nurs ; 33(8): 372-380, 2024 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639750

RESUMEN

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the wound healing process, emphasising the critical role of surgical staples in primary intention healing. It outlines the four distinct phases of wound healing including haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and maturation - and discusses the mechanisms by which surgical staples enhance this natural biological process. Special focus is given to the aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT), which is crucial in preventing infections during the staple removal procedure. The article further explores the procedural steps involved in the removal of surgical staples and highlights the holistic aspects of patient care that need to be considered. This includes strategies for effective pain management, ensuring informed consent, and maintaining a sterile environment. By integrating clinical skills with a thorough understanding of wound care, this article aims to improve nursing practices in surgical settings, promoting better patient outcomes and recovery.


Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones , Cicatrización de Heridas , Humanos , Suturas , Inflamación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
17.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14860, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572791

RESUMEN

Identifying predictors for surgical site infections (SSIs) after emergency surgical treatment for traumatic pulmonary haemorrhage (TPH) is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study aims to ascertain these predictors. In this comprehensive retrospective study, conducted from January 2020 to December 2023 at our institution, 75 patients were analysed, including a case group of 25 patients with SSIs and a control group of 50 without SSIs post-TPH surgery. Inclusion criteria focused on patients aged 18 and above undergoing thoracotomy or minimally invasive thoracic surgery for TPH. Exclusion criteria included compromised immune systems, chronic pulmonary diseases, prior thoracic surgery or active infections at admission. We assessed several predictors: anaemia; operation time over 2 h; hospital stay over 5 days; intraoperative blood loss exceeding 500 mL; body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2; age ≥ 50 years; use of surgical drains; the presence of open wounds; diabetes mellitus and non-prophylactic antibiotic use. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate logistic regression, using SPSS Version 27.0. Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between SSIs and surgical drain placement, diabetes mellitus, open wounds and non-prophylactic antibiotic use (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed these factors as significant predictors of SSIs, with notable odds ratios. Other variables like anaemia, extended hospital stay, excessive intraoperative blood loss, older age and higher BMI did not significantly predict SSIs. Significant predictors for SSIs following TPH surgery include surgical drain placement, diabetes mellitus, open wounds and non-prophylactic antibiotic use. Identifying and managing these risks is crucial in clinical practice to reduce SSIs incidence and improve patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Anemia , Diabetes Mellitus , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9690, 2024 04 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678140

RESUMEN

Despite evidence suggesting the benefit of prophylactic regional antibiotic delivery (RAD) to sternal edges during cardiac surgery, it is seldom performed in clinical practice. The value of topical vancomycin and gentamicin for sternal wound infections (SWI) prophylaxis was further questioned by recent studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the safety and effectiveness of RAD to reduce the risk of SWI.We screened multiple databases for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of RAD (vancomycin, gentamicin) in SWI prophylaxis. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was any SWI; other wound complications were also analysed. Odds Ratios served as the primary statistical analyses. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.Thirteen RCTs (N = 7,719 patients) were included. The odds of any SWI were significantly reduced by over 50% with any RAD: OR (95%CIs): 0.49 (0.35-0.68); p < 0.001 and consistently reduced in vancomycin (0.34 [0.18-0.64]; p < 0.001) and gentamicin (0.58 [0.39-0.86]; p = 0.007) groups (psubgroup = 0.15). Similarly, RAD reduced the odds of SWI in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (0.46 [0.32-0.65]; p < 0.001 and 0.60 [0.44-0.83]; p = 0.002 respectively). Cumulative Z-curve passed the TSA-adjusted boundary for SWIs suggesting adequate power has been met and no further trials are needed. RAD significantly reduced deep (0.60 [0.43-0.83]; p = 0.003) and superficial SWIs (0.54 [0.32-0.91]; p = 0.02). No differences were seen in mediastinitis and mortality, however, limited number of studies assessed these endpoints. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity, sternal dehiscence and resistant strains emergence. Both vancomycin and gentamicin reduced the odds of cultures outside their respective serum concentrations' activity: vancomycin against gram-negative strains: 0.20 (0.01-4.18) and gentamicin against gram-positive strains: 0.42 (0.28-0.62); P < 0.001. Regional antibiotic delivery is safe and effectively reduces the risk of SWI in cardiac surgery patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Gentamicinas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Vancomicina , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Gentamicinas/administración & dosificación , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Esternón/cirugía , Esternón/microbiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos
19.
Int Wound J ; 21(4): e14838, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577937

RESUMEN

Wound infection is a serious complication that impacts the prognosis of patients after colorectal surgery (CS). Probiotics and synbiotics (Pro and Syn) are live bacteria that produce bacteriostatic agents in the intestinal system and have a positive effect on postoperative wound infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Pro and Syn on complications of wound infection after CS. In November 2023, we searched relevant clinical trial reports from Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and screened the retrieved reports, extracted data, and finally analysed the data by using RevMan 5.3. A total of 12 studies with 1567 patients were included in the study. Pro and Syn significantly reduced total infection (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.56; p < 0.00001), surgical incision site infection (SSI) (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45, 0.81; p = 0.002), pneumonia (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25, 0.72; p = 0.001), urinary tract infection (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14, 0.56; p = 0.0003), and Pro and Syn did not reduce anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50, 1.41; p = 0.51). Pro and Syn can reduce postoperative wound infections in patients with colorectal cancer, which benefits patients' postoperative recovery.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Probióticos , Simbióticos , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
20.
Sci Transl Med ; 16(742): eadk8222, 2024 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598612

RESUMEN

Despite modern antiseptic techniques, surgical site infection (SSI) remains a leading complication of surgery. However, the origins of SSI and the high rates of antimicrobial resistance observed in these infections are poorly understood. Using instrumented spine surgery as a model of clean (class I) skin incision, we prospectively sampled preoperative microbiomes and postoperative SSI isolates in a cohort of 204 patients. Combining multiple forms of genomic analysis, we correlated the identity, anatomic distribution, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of SSI pathogens with those of preoperative strains obtained from the patient skin microbiome. We found that 86% of SSIs, comprising a broad range of bacterial species, originated endogenously from preoperative strains, with no evidence of common source infection among a superset of 1610 patients. Most SSI isolates (59%) were resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic administered during surgery, and their resistance phenotypes correlated with the patient's preoperative resistome (P = 0.0002). These findings indicate the need for SSI prevention strategies tailored to the preoperative microbiome and resistome present in individual patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Piel , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA